Elinor Ostrom, the sign of the times will be remembered Teodulo Lopez Melendez my continued assertion that the primacy of economics over politics has been one of the causes of most of the evils that have sprung up in modern times in matters relating to the social impoverishment. He claimed, therefore, that policy must regain its primacy over policy and pointed out that this is one of the desirable characteristics to the global world in birth. The fact that a political scientist wins the Nobel Prize in economics indicates, I think, a sign of this reordering of priorities. It could also be called a socioeconomic Dr. Ostrom, because it is valid now speak of sciences which are intertwined and form new specialties.

The economy can not be a cold where the social science is diluted in the macroeconomic or where systems do not prioritize the man, the true object of all economic and political action. To make matters worse, Elinor Ostrom has focused on institutional diversity, the action collective use of land and the theory of public action, among other issues where he has laid a real school. The Nobel was won by his demonstrations of “how the commons can be managed effectively by a group of users.” In other words Ostrom departs from classical economics. His work has influenced biologists, on considerations concerning ecosystems and the development of the tenets of what has been called the commons. A simplistic view of economic systems never took into account the immense opportunity that exists between the market and the interventionist policies of the central states.